Kamis, 24 November 2016

MANAJEMEN DISTRIBUSI #23112016
MATERI : VALUE CHAIN
SUMBER BACAAN : COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE : CREATING AND SUSTAINING SUPERIOR  PERFORMANCE    ----    MICHAEL E. PORTER (1998)
EDITED BY : I Putu Yoga Wiranata


Value Chain
menampilkan  total nilai dan terdiri dari kegiatan nilai dan marjin. Setiap aktivitas value mempekerjakan , pembelian input, SDM, dan teknologi untuk melaksanakan fungsinya



Value Activity
Membutuhkaan isolasi aktivitas dar strategi dan teknologi yang berbeda.
*      Aktivitas Primer :
-          Inbound logistics : aktivitas yang berhubungan dengan penanganan material .
-          Operation  :  aktivitas yang berhubungan dengan pengolahan input menjadi output.
-          Outbond logistic : aktivitas untuk menyampaikan produk ke tangan konsumen.
-          Marketing and sales :  aktivitas pengarahan konsumen agar tertarik membeli produk
-          Service : aktivitas mempertahankan/meningkatkan nilai produk.
*      Supported aktivitas:
-          Procurement :berkaitan dengan proses perolehan input.
-          Teknological development: pengembangan peralatan,software,hardware,prosedur dalam transformasi produk.-
-          Human resource management  :pengaturan SDM
-          Infrastruktur : terdiri dari departemen yang melayani kebutuhan organisasi dan mengikat bagiannya menjadi kesatuan.
Tipe aktivitas : Direct, Indirect, Quality Assurance.


Value Chain dan Analisis Biaya
Point pertama dalam  analisis biaya adalah mendifinisikan value chain perusahaan .
Menetapkan Biaya dan Aset
Setelah mengidentifikasi rantai nilai, perusahaan harus menetapkan biaya operasi dan aset untuk kegiatan nilai. Aset harus ditugaskan untuk kegiatan yang mempekerjakan, kontrol, atau paling mempengaruhi penggunaannya.


STRATEGI DIFERENSIASI
Diferensiasi dapat didasarkan pada atribut produk, sistem pengiriman produk, ancangan pemasaran, dan beberapa aspek lainnya. Perusahaan yang dapat mencapai dan melestarikan diferensiasinya akan menjadi perusahaan dengan kinerja diatas rata rata untuk memperoleh keunikan.

Rantai Nilai & Teknologi
Setiap aktivitas nilai menciptakan dan menggunakan informasi ini terbukti, yang menunjukan formasi sistem teknologi dalam setiap kategori.
Hubungan dalam Value Chain
Penyebab dari hubungan tersebut:

  • Fungsi yang sam dilakukan dengan cara berbeda.
  • Biaya atau kinerja direct activities diperbaiki dengan usaha yang lebih.
  • Aktivitas yang dilakukan di perusahaan mengurangi kebutuhan memperagakan, menjelaskan, atau melayani produk lapangan.
  • Fungsi quality assurance  dilakukan dengan cara berbeda

Rabu, 26 Oktober 2016

#261016 TM5 THIRD PARTY LOGISTICS sumber lengley,et at (2009) versi lengkap

"Guanxi" adalah istilah cina untuk mereka ketergantungan pada kepercayaan dan kemitraan dalam web hubungan kapal untuk mencapai keuntungan tertentu. Untuk melakukan bisnis di cina untuk berhasil, asing perlu memahami dan menghormati sistem sosial kuno ini.
Tapi guanxi its't digantikan oleh usia koneksi web dan email? tidak manajer Cina saat ini jauh lebih menantikan untuk jasa dan kinerja obyektif daripada kekerabatan, arahan dan berbagi pengalaman? memang benar bahwa pola pikir berubah, tetapi ada banyak alasan budaya abadi mengapa kita harus mengharapkan guanxi. menjadi sekitar untuk waktu yang lama .author francis fukuyama berpendapat bahwa dalam masyarakat di mana orang tidak bisa mempercayai "sistem" untuk keadilan, mereka menaruh kepercayaan mereka dalam hubungan mereka tahu bahwa mereka dapat bergantung pada ini sebagai benar bagi para pemimpin bisnis di banyak bagian kata barat seperti untuk orang-orang bisnis di cina

Definisi Third Partly Logistik
Dasarnya Third Partly Logistic atau logistik pihak ketiga mungkin dapat didefinisikan sebagai yang melakukan semua atau sebagian dari fungsi logistik. Definisi ini sengaja secara luas dimaksudkan untuk mencangkup pemasok layanan transportasi, pergudangan, distribusi, layanan keuangan dsb. Ada karakteristik yang diinginkan dari “true”3PL diantaranya sudah termasuk beberapa kegiatan logistik. Mereka yang termasuk “terintegrasi” atau yang memanage secara bersama-sama, dan mereka yang menyediakan “solusi” untuk masalah logistik/rantai pasok.
Baru baru ini telah ada peningkatan secara signifikan jumlah perusahaan yang menawarkan layanan tersebut dan tren ini diperkirakan akan terus berlanjut. Contohnya termasuk UPS supply chain solution, Fedex supply chain services, IBM Supply chain management services, Ryder, DHL-Exel, Menlo Logistics, dan Agility Inc. Third Partly Logistic terkadang memiliki persyaratan kontrak logistik dan outsourcing. Meskipun banyak pelanggan yang menggunakan 3PL banyak pelanggan yang memilih beberapa kontrak formal untuk mendefinisikan perjanjian itu adalah catatan menarik bahwa sejumlah kecil perusahaan memilih untuk tidak memiliki kontrak dengan pemasok jasa logistik mereka.

Jenis-Jenis Penyedia 3 PL

1.                  Basis Transportasi
Yang termasuk perusahaan pemasok berbasis transportasi diantaranya UPS supply chain solution, Fedex supply chain services, DHL, Ryder, Menlo Logistic, dan Schineder Logistik. Beberapa pelayanan yang disediakan oleh perusahaan-perusahaan ini memanfaatkan basis transportasi sebagai organisasi induk. Di semua instansi perusahaan yang melampaui aktivitas logistik menawarkan transportasi yang lebih koprehensif.

2.                  Pergudangan/Basis Distribusi
Menurut tradisi banyak pemasok logistik berbasis pergudangan/distribusi berkecimpung dalam bisnis pergudangan umum ataupun memiliki kontrak, dan layanan logistik telah berkembang menjadi lebih luas. Contoh perusahaan tersebut antara lain Ozburn Hassey Logistik, DSC logistik, Saddle Creek Corporation dan Standard Corporation. Berdasar orientasi tradisi organisasi jenis ini sudah terlibat dalam kegiatan logistik, seperti manajemen persediaan, pergudangan, distribusi, dsb. Pengalaman telah menunjukan bahwa basis fasilitas ini, operator menemukan transisilayanan logistik terpadu menjadi kurang kompleks dari pada memiliki transportasi.

3.                  Forwarder/Ekspeditur
Perusahaan yang termasuk dalam kategori ini diantaranya kuehne&negel, Fritz, dsb. Dasarnya pemilik perusahaan non aset berurusan dengan berbagai pemasok jasa logistik yang sangat independen, mereka telah terbukti cukup mampu menyusun paket layanan logistik yang memenuhi kebutuhan pelanggan.

4.                  Financial base/Basis Keuangan
Kategori penyedia 3PL ini termasuk perusahaan perusahaan seperti CTC(Comercial Traffic Corporation), AIMS Logistic, kontrol dan akuntansi biaya dan alat manajemen logistik untuk monitoring, booking, pelacakan,jiplakan, dan mengelola persediaan.

5.                  Basis Informasi
Pada saat penulisan teks ini, pertumbuhan dan perkembangan internet, business to businesss, elektronik market untuk transportasi dan layanan logistik sangat signifikan. karena sumber daya secara efektif merupakan sumber alternatif bagi mereka yang membutuhkan transportasi pembelian dan jasa logistik, mereka dapat dianggap sebagai jenis inovatif baru dari penyedia Third-partly.

Ukuran Pasar 3PL dan Ruang Lingkup

Tabel 4-2 berisi kutipan dari ringkasan dari pengirim tertentu yang diidentifikasi oleh armstrong & rekan, sebagai memanfaatkan beberapa 3pls. Berdasarkan tabel 4-2, motor umum menduduki peringkat tertinggi dengan 43 penyedia 3pl. pengirim perwakilan lainnya menggunakan beberapa 3pls juga ditunjukkan.
Ditunjukkan dalam tabel 4-3 merupakan perkiraan dari pendapatan industri 3PL global untuk tahun 2005. Seperti yang bisa dilihat, total pendapatan untuk Amerika Utara dari 119 miliar merupakan sekitar sepertiga dari total perkiraan pengeluaran global 370 miliar. Gambar 4-6 penyedia melihat pertumbuhan pasar 3PL logistik di amerika serikat, di mana pertumbuhan omset telah meningkat dari 30,8 miliar pada tahun 1996 menjadi sekitar 103,7 miliar pada tahun 2005. Karena banyak penyedia 3PL yang "tidak berbasis -asset " angka lain yang relevan adalah "bersih" pendapatan, yang dihitung sebagai pendapatan kotor dikurangi biaya transportasi dibeli dan layanan logistik. Secara umum, diperkirakan pihak ketiga pendapatan logistik bersih adalah sekitar 55% sampai 60% dari jumlah yang ditunjukkan pada tabel 4-3 dan mencari 4-6.



Disponsori oleh Georgia Tech, Capgemini LLC, DHL, dan SAP; menyediakan luas dan pengguna melihat logistik pihak ketiga industri perspektif pelanggan layanan logistik. tujuan studi khusus adalah sebagai berikut:

-Mengukur perkembangan dan pertumbuhan segmen industri utama industri 3PL dan beberapa daerah beragam kata-kata
-Meringkas penggunaan jasa layanan 3PL
-Mengidentifikasi kebutuhan pelanggan dan seberapa baik penyedia 3PL menanggapi kebutuhan tersebut
-Memahami bagaimana pelanggan memilih dan mengelola penyedia 3PL
-Memeriksa mengapa pelanggan outsourcing atau memilih untuk tidak melakukan outsourcing untuk penyedia 3PL
-Selidiki topik terkemuka, termasuk penawaran layanan 3PL dan kemampuan, pemberdayaan, penataan dan pengelolaan hubungan efektif
-Memahami pelanggan isu-isu kontemporer yang berkaitan dengan hubungan dan melihat ke dalam isu-isu berkaitan dengan layanan yang mungkin komponen efektif dari pasokan yang berfungsi dengan baik
-Memberikan penilaian strategis masa depan industri 3PL

Kendaraan utama untuk mengumpulkan perspektif pelanggan adalah survei yang dikirim melalui internet ke eksekutif logistik utama di perusahaan terkemuka dalam industri berikut: otomotif, kimia, produk konsumen, makanan dan minuman, berteknologi tinggi dan elektronik, industri manufaktur / industri pertahanan, ilmu kehidupan dan kesehatan, ritel dan telekomunikasi. Industri tersebut terpilin karena mereka melihat logistik sebagai strategis penting dan membuat gerakan terarah menuju manajemen rantai pasokan terpadu. Terakhir, elemen kunci dari metodologi penelitian termasuk memegang lokakarya dengan pelanggan dari 3PLs di Accelerated Solutions Environment (ASE). 


Keseluruhan penggunaan 3PLs  Penggunaan layanan 3PL adalah signifikan dalam wilayah dunia yang diteliti. Antara tahun 2002 dan beberapa persentase pengguna Amerika Utara menunjukkan pertumbuhan moderat ditambah dengan menggunakan stabilitas. Dalam tiga tahun terbaru dari data survei, persentase jasa perusahaan 3PL di Eropa Barat antara 76 persen dan 79 persen di Asia-Pasifik, penggunaan 3PL selama dua tahun terakhir telah 84 persen. Berdasarkan dua tahun penggunaan 3PL Data dari Amerika Latin, layanan persen sini kurang lazim daripada di daerah logis outsourcing lainnya. 

Kegiatan Logistik Outsourching
Tabel 4-4 merangkum penggunaan jasa logistik khusus yang dilaporkan sebagai outsourcing oleh responden di berbagai daerah yang diteliti pada tahun 2006. Berdasarkan informasi ini, logistik paling sering keluar bersumber adalah mereka yang lebih melihat hasil dari transaksi yang berulang-ulang di alam. Layanan tersebut meliputi daerah transportasi kemarahan paling sering outsourcing (90%), dan pergudangan (74%), bea cukai dan perdagangan perantara (70%), dan ekspedisi (54%).
Isu strategis adalah bagaimana merasakan pelanggan yang lebih strategis di alam 3PLs harus memposisikan diri dalam hal kedalaman dan penawaran layanan. Berdasarkan temuan yang dilaporkan lebih fokus dan pemasok harus menunjukkan perjanjian dengan negara terbatas dengan menyediakan luas.

Dilihat dari non pelanggan untuk membantu lebih memahami mereka yang tidak di antara pengguna jasa 3PL, penelitian meminta sejumlah pertanyaan tentang pilihan mereka untuk tidak begitu melibatkan
Berdasarkan pada angka-angka ini, alasan yang paling penting bahwa organisasi telah memilih untuk tidak keluar sumber layanan logistik adalah keyakinan bahwa logistik adalah kompetensi inti di organisasi mereka. Alasan lain termasuk keyakinan dan / atau harapan bahwa pengurangan biaya tidak akan terwujud, kontrol atas fungsi outsourcing akan berkurang, komitmen tingkat serivce tidak akan terwujud dan memiliki keahlian logistik dari penyedia 3PL
Menariknya, dan seperti yang dilaporkan dalam tahun-tahun sebelumnya, banyak pelanggan yang menarik dari 3 pls telah puas dengan hubungan seperti itu karena mereka membantu untuk meningkatkan (bukan mengurangi) kontrol

Peran strategis teknologi informasi

Sebuah utama dari studi tahun 2006 adalah untuk mendapatkan wawasan lebih lanjut untuk kebutuhan pelanggan untuk layanan informasi berbasis tachnologt, serta mengevaluasi bagaimana 3PL menanggapi. Mengingat pentingnya teknologi informasi untuk manajemen rantai pasokan secara umum, topik ini juga sangat relevan dengan topik hubungan rantai pasokan dan digunakan 3PLs.

Meskipun hasil studi terbaru menunjukkan bahwa pelanggan ingin melihat ke 3PLs mereka untuk kepemimpinan dalam teknologi informasi, setiap kekurangan yang ada mungkin karena fakta bahwa mereka tidak melihat sektor 3PL untuk menjadi terlibat atau kuat di daerah ini penyedia teknologi themselve. Meskipun hal ini mungkin benar dalam tertentu dalam jarak, banyak 3PL menggunakan bidang teknologi untuk membedakan diri dari pesaing mereka. Misalnya, ketersediaan kompeten perangkat lunak manajemen transportasi dan / atau perangkat lunak manajemen gudang dari 3PL adalah sesuatu yang dapat diharapkan. Hal ini sangat relevan, mengingat temuan 'studi yang "memiliki" beberapa tahun terakhir benar' software "adalah keunggulan kompetitif utama untuk 3PL. Ketika ditanya tentang statisfaction mereka secara keseluruhan dengan perangkat lunak dan dukungan IT yang tersedia dari 3PLs, sebagian besar pengguna menunjukkan bahwa perbaikan yang diperlukan.

Manajemen dan Isu Hubungan
Kebutuhan kompetensi yang berkaitan dengan pembentukan dan kelanjutan dari hubungan yang sukses telah menjadi penting dalam industri 3PL hari ini. Meskipun kedua penyedia dan pengguna jasa 3PL telah meningkatkan kemampuan mereka untuk menciptakan hubungan bisnis yang lebih produktif, efektif, dan memuaskan, media di penuh dengan contoh hubungan yang gagal pertanyaan adalah "apa yang bisa kita lakukan untuk meningkatkan di daerah ini?"

Sebuah temuan menarik dari salah satu studi tahun sebelumnya adalah bahwa kepala eksekutif di daerah logistik adalah orang yang jelas yang paling menyadari kebutuhan untuk layanan 3PL. sedangkan bukti yang ada mendukung fakta bahwa presiden atau CEO dan eksekutif keuangan dari daerah lain seperti manufaktur, sumber daya manusia, pemasaran, dan sistem informasi juga menyadari kebutuhan tersebut, tetapi untuk tingkat yang lebih rendah. mencari sebuah tugas untuk melaksanakan hubungan 3PL, namun, itu jelas bahwa eksekutif sistem informasi menjadi semakin terlibat. ini tidak mengejutkan mengingat peran kunci dari IT di banyak logistik saat ini dan proses supply chain

Teknologi Rantai Pasokan
3PLs perlu mengisi peran diperluas dalam rantai pasokan hari ini

mereka yang mengelola logistik dan layanan rantai pasokan semakin bertanya tentang apa layanan 3PL yang tepat akan untuk outsourcing proses rantai pasokan fungsi tertentu menarik, banyak dari kekhawatiran ini berhubungan dengankekurangan untuk logistik tradisional perlu seperti transportasi dan pergudangan, dan lainnya perubahan kunci tersebut sebagai berikut.

- Rantai pasokan yang semakin global dalam lingkup
- Strategi optimasi persediaan telah strategi luar batas perusahaan tunggal untuk menyertakan mitra dan pelanggan yang bekerja di perusahaan

Manajemen Rantai Suplai adalah koordinasi dari bahan, informasi dan arus keuangan antara perusahaan yang berpartisipasi. Manajemen rantai suplai bisa juga berarti seluruh jenis kegiatan komoditas dasar hingga penjualan produk akhir ke konsumen untuk mendaur ulang produk yang sudah dipakai.
·         Arus material melibatkan arus produk fisik dari pemasok sampai konsumen melalui rantai, sama baiknya dengan arus balik dari retur produk, layanan, daur ulang dan pembuangan.
·         Arus informasi meliputi ramalan permintaan, transmisi pesanan dan laporan status pesanan, arus ini berjalan dua arah antara konsumen akhir dan penyedia material mentah.
·         Arus keuangan meliputi informasi kartu kredit, syarat-syarat kredit, jadwal pembayaran dalam penetapan kepemilikandan pengiriman.
Menurut Turban, Rainer, Porter (2004, h321), terdapat 3 macam komponen rantai suplai, yaitu:
·         Rantai Suplai Hulu/Upstream supply chain
Bagian upstream (hulu) supply chain meliputi aktivitas dari suatu perusahaan manufaktur dengan para penyalurannya (yang mana dapat manufaktur, assembler, atau kedua-duanya) dan koneksi mereka kepada pada penyalur mereka (para penyalur second-trier). Hubungan para penyalur dapat diperluas kepada beberapa strata, semua jalan dari asal material (contohnya bijih tambang, pertumbuhan tanaman). Di dalam upstream supply chain, aktivitas yang utama adalah pengadaan.
·         Manajemen Internal Suplai Rantai/Internal supply chain management
Bagian dari internal supply chain meliputi semua proses pemasukan barang ke gudang yang digunakan dalam mentransformasikan masukan dari para penyalur ke dalam keluaran organisasi itu. Hal ini meluas dari waktu masukan masuk ke dalam organisasi. Di dalam rantai suplai internal, perhatian yang utama adalah manajemen produksi, pabrikasi, dan pengendalian persediaan.
·         Segmen Rantai Suplai Hilir/Downstream supply chain segment
Downstream (arah muara) supply chain meliputi semua aktivitas yang melibatkan pengiriman produk kepada pelanggan akhir. Di dalam downstream supply chain, perhatian diarahkan pada distribusi, pergudangan, transportasi, dan after-sales-service.

penelitian manajemen perdagangan global tahun lalu menunjukkan bahwa lebih dari 90 persen dari perbandingan survei mengandalkan keluarnya sumber penyedia logistik untuk menjalankan logistik global mereka membutuhkan. tingkat tinggi mereka outsourcing (Alih Daya) ketergantungan untuk kompetensi dalam dan teknologi yang mampu mengelola masalah logistik yang lebih kompleks mungkin akan menyebar ke adopsi atau outsourcing (Alih Daya) dalam area lain dari manajemen rantai pasokan. juga, perusahaan melaporkan "jauh – penyangga" Outsourcing (Alih Daya) ingin memastikan bahwa "total mendarat biaya" terus menjadi menarik. sebagai contoh, mempertimbangkan tinggi populer - berakhir perusahaan elektronik konsumen yang ber expedisi yang teratur tinggi tertentu - produk menjual dari asia karena ramalan yang akurat dan waktu panjang rantai pasokan Asia-nya. memotong? produk biaya $ 100 per unit, dan biaya percepatan adalah $ 80 per Unit
Pengaturan harapan relatif dalam hubungan manajemen 3PL
85 persen menunjukkan bahwa kualitas layanan merupakan faktor, mencari di luar ini untuk kriteria seleksi lain yang lebih penting termasuk persence geografis di wilayah 75% kemampuan diharapkan diperlukan untuk meningkatkan servis level kisaran 67% dari yang tersedia layanan nilai tambah logistik 63% dan informasi teknologi yang mampu 60%
juga, hubungan 3PL sukses membangun peran yang tepat dan tanggung jawab untuk kedua 3pls dan perusahaan klien sementara kadang-kadang penggunaan 3 pls ditafsirkan hanya sebagai "membalik semua logistik kegiatan" ke penyedia responden outsourcing penelitian beberapa tahun terakhir menunjukkan bahwa "hybrid" manajemen struktur merupakan cara yang sangat efektif untuk mengelola hubungan 3pls

kerangka nilai pelanggan
umumnya ,3pls menggunakan beberapa wilayah yang diteliti ditandai upaya outsourcing sebagai milik mereka ini adalah dukungan oleh informasi yang terdapat dalam angka 4-10 yang memberikan perspektif 10 tahun pada persentase 3PL pengguna di berbagai wilayah yang dinilai layanan 3PL mereka sebagai baik "sangat" atau "agak" sukses










hasil rata-rata pelanggan dari penggunaan penyedia logistik pihak ketiga
responden dalam studi terbaru melaporkan mengalami sejumlah masalah :
1. Komitmen tingkat layanan tidak terlaksana
2. waktu dan upaya yang dihabiskan untuk logistik tidak berkurang
3. pengurangan biaya belum terealisasi
4. kurangnya kemampuan global

Diharapkan pertumbuhan pelanggan menggunakan layanan 3PL salah satu cara untuk melihat rencana masa depan untuk outsourcing adalah untuk meminta pengguna jasa 3PL untuk memperkirakan 3 sampai 5 tahun tingkat pertumbuhan yang diharapkan dari pengeluaran outsourcing sebagai persen dari pengeluaran logistik secara keseluruhan. Berdasarkan hasil untuk tahun 2006 seperti yang ditunjukkan pada gambar 4-12, rata-rata persentase kenaikan diharapkan dalam 3 sampai 5 tahun ke depan akan menjadi 17% di Amerika Utara, 11% di Eropa Barat, 11% di Asia-Pasifik, dan 20% di Amerika latin.

Model logistik outsourcing untuk masa depan
Dimulai dengan penyediaan proprietary jasa logistik, atau insourcing, di bagian bawah diagram, model berkembang melalui beberapa tahap berturut-turut. Termasuk layanan dasar (transportasi, pergudangan, dll), nilai tambah atau 3PL layanan, memimpin logistik atau jasa 4pl, dan layanan canggih.






#261016 TM5-THIRD PARTY LOGISTICS sumber : Langley,et al (2009) halaman 129-131

 129
Pengaturan harapan relatif dalam hubungan manajemen 3PL


85 persen menunjukkan bahwa kualitas layanan merupakan faktor, mencari di luar ini untuk kriteria seleksi lain yang lebih penting termasuk persence geografis di wilayah 75% kemampuan diharapkan diperlukan untuk meningkatkan servis level kisaran 67% dari yang tersedia layanan nilai tambah logistik 63% dan informasi teknologi yang mampu 60%
juga, hubungan 3PL sukses membangun peran yang tepat dan tanggung jawab untuk kedua 3pls dan perusahaan klien sementara kadang-kadang penggunaan 3 pls ditafsirkan hanya sebagai "membalik semua logistik kegiatan" ke penyedia responden outsourcing penelitian beberapa tahun terakhir menunjukkan bahwa "hybrid" manajemen struktur merupakan cara yang sangat efektif untuk mengelola hubungan 3pls



kerangka nilai pelanggan




umumnya ,3pls menggunakan beberapa wilayah yang diteliti ditandai upaya outsourcing sebagai milik mereka ini adalah dukungan oleh informasi yang terdapat dalam angka 4-10 yang memberikan perspektif 10 tahun pada persentase 3PL pengguna di berbagai wilayah yang dinilai layanan 3PL mereka sebagai baik "sangat" atau "agak" sukses

131

hasil rata-rata pelanggan dari penggunaan penyedia logistik pihak ketiga

responden dalam studi terbaru melaporkan mengalami sejumlah masalah

1. Komitmen tingkat layanan tidak terlaksana
2. waktu dan upaya yang dihabiskan untuk logistik tidak berkurang
3. pengurangan biaya belum terealisasi
4. kurangnya kemampuan global


Senin, 17 Oktober 2016

PERBAIKAN CONTROLLING DISTRIBUTION

After the establishment of Migros, Gima was established as a national supermarket chain and aimed to supply main food products cheaper as Migros. During these years, private companies have not been developed yet and government was still the dominant factor in the economy. Retail sector did not require high capital, qualified employees, and entry barriers (Erdogan, 2003). In 1960s, private companies such as Beymen, Vakko, Yeni Karamürsel, and IGS began to rise in the retail sector whereas the biggest retail companies were just consumption cooperatives which developed self-service retailing concept in these years (Bocutoglu and Atasoy, 2001). These activities that contribute to the development of retailing sector initiate the establishment of multi-storey stores and chain stores (Savasci, 2002). Tansas which was established in 1973 with the goal of providing cheaper meat and coal opened its first store in 1976 in Izmir and improved the supermarket technology in the retail industry. The numbers of food retailers have begun to rise in the industry. Food retailing aims to satisfy consumer needs by offering food and non-food products, and also customer services (Ozkan and Akpinar, 2003). Within the scope of these developments at the end of 70s, there were two main alterations in the sector: food retailers started to offer nonfood products such as detergent and oil besides the food products, and traditional mom-andpop store retailers began to specialize on one product line especially food products instead of specializing on perfumery products, stationery products, and drugs (Erdogan, 2003). The draft law on encouragement of large scale retailers in 1973 was suggested to improve retail industry however; it has failed (Tek and Ozgul, 2005). The Period after 1980: Privatization and Internationalization Until 1980s import-substituting policies have been followed in Turkish economy. In the year 1980, these policies were left and the policies related to open to foreign countries with export-led began to be followed. Export activities were encouraged by applications such as subsidies and tax refund, and domestic commodity markets were opened to the world markets. In 1989, with the removal of all the arrangements concerning international capital movements, the convertibility of the national currency was ensured and the economy was opened to foreign countries completely (Kose and Oncu, 2000). Government policies oriented towards deregulation in retailing as well as in the economy generally. Privatisation was one of the major policies of government to liberalise the economy. Migros was privatised in 1975 by Koc Holding, and also Gima was privatised soon after government announced its privatisation plans. To encourage foreign and big domestic investments, the government gave incentives to the retailers. The establishment of shopping centres and large stores, also called big box retailers, were supported through investment incentives starting in 1985 (Ozcan, 2001). The first shopping centre called Galeria was opened in Istanbul in 1988. The retail industry has gone through major changes since the late 80s. Coskun (2001) claimed that Turkey's stance on foreign investment has become increasingly open and aggressive since the major economic policy shift from importsubstituting towards export-led development in 1980. International investors have been taking an increasingly part in the Turkish economy. Reshaped foreign investment regime makes it possible that all fields open to the Turkish private sector are open to foreign investment without any limitation. Consequently, total foreign investment reached from $97 million in 1980 to over $8.6 billion in 1998. Foreign investments have been still going on to increase and new laws have been developed. The Encouragement of Foreign Investment Law - No. 6224 in 1954 was enhanced, updated, and turned into the Foreign Direct Investment Law - No. 4875 in 2003 (Ozbilgic, 2012). Turkish retail structure was fragmented and non-integrated until 1990s; small-scale, capital-weak, independent, and family owned retailers were dominating the retail trade European Scientific Journal February 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 116 (Kumcu and Kumcu, 1987; Samli, 1964, 1970; Kaynak, 1982, 1986; Tokatli and Boyaci, 1998). The years 1990s were the beginning of retail era for Turkey, 2000s were the years of modern retailing and internationalisation movements (Tek and Ozgul, 2005). In 1992, the numbers of grocery stores were 124.877 whereas the numbers of supermarkets were 11.373 (Kursunluoglu, 2006). Organized food retailing was developing slowly in these years. During 90s, many retailers have started to operate in Turkey and during 2000s internationalisation movements strengthened the industry. The Germany’s largest cash and carry store Metro entered into Turkish market in 1990. Promodes that was founded in 1961 in France as a supermarket opened its operations in Turkey. Another French hypermarket Carrefour began to operate in Turkey in 1993. In 1996, it became CarrefourSA after the joint venture association between Carrefour and Sabanci Holding. Kipa was established in Izmir with the investments of 100 investors in 1992 and opened its first store in 1994 in Izmir. Bim that became the number one in Q Ratio among 250 retailers according to the Deloitte (2013) opened its first store in 1995 as a discount retailer. Tokatli and Boyaci (1998) showed the foreign retailers in the industry: US companies McDonalds, Kentucky Fried Chicken and Pizza Hut entered into the market in the late 1980s, Subway and Burger King in the 1990s. French Printemps (1987) and British Marks and Spencer (1995) were among the pioneering retailers in the department or variety store category. In the clothing sector many retailers entered into the Turkish market for example Italy’s Benetton (1986) and Sisley (1991), the US company Levi’s (1989), the British retailer Mothercare (1988), and many others such as Burberry’s, Austin Reed, Stefanel, Versace, Ermenegildo Zegna, Naf Naf, and Chanel. It was also possible to see different retail format in these years with the increasing capacity of foreign investments. Direct selling is a type of non-store retailing and category killer retailers are the types of store retailing (Varinli and Oyman, 2013; Kursunluoglu, 2009). Direct selling has been improved in Turkey in 1990s; the US companies Avon and Amway started their operations in 1993. The US company Toys R Us and the Swedish Ikea entered into the Turkish market in 1996 and 2003 respectively as category killers. Along with the new retailers' operations in the industry, the retail industry has developed. Modern retailing has been improved and has replaced of traditional retailing activities. Yilmaz and Altunisik (2003) showed that the biggest national groups started to invest in Turkish retail sector and Turkey became a country that has been given priority for entering by the foreign investors. The retail sector has continued to grow up as the numbers of national and international retailers increase. At the beginning of 2000s, Turkish economy has suffered from the financial crises and before the end of the effects of 2000 crisis, 2001 crisis has arisen (Yeldan, 2001). It was shown that after these crises, most sectors preferred downsizing however; organized retailing sector especially supermarkets continued to grow. In 2005, the numbers of organized retailers have increased but the numbers of grocery stores were still higher than the numbers of organized retailers. The numbers of supermarkets were 968 in 2003; it increased to 1.258 in 2005 (Kursunluoglu, 2006). The profits of organized retailers began to increase thanks to lower price, and higher sales promotions against traditional retailers such as grocery, stationery, and perfumery stores. The competition in the retailing sector has still been in progress not only among organized retailers but also organized and traditional retailers. Turkey Grocery Stores and Dealers Federation (2000) showed that market shares of hypermarkets and supermarkets in the total retail market were 10 % in 1995, 14 % in 1997 and it was estimated that it would reach 35 % in 2004. Consumers preferred purchasing from organized retailers instead of grocery stores due to supermarkets offered lots of products varieties, faster service, store atmosphere elements such as exhibition and internal design, European Scientific Journal February 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 117 wide shopping area, reliable image, lower price, early opening and late closing, different customer services such as parking, café, restaurant, and playground. Towards the end of 2000s, Turkish retail industry has evolved with domestic and foreign investments. 2000s were the years of modernization work and internationalization. In the year 2003, English supermarket chain Tesco acquired Kipa and moved on the operations as Tesco Kipa. In 2005, Carrefour acquired Gima and Endi which belong to Fiba Holding. American discount store chain Wal-Mart has thought to enter Turkish market through acquiring Migros. Migros opened its first outside store in 1996 in Baku, Azerbaijan under the name of Ramstore. Except these internationalization activities, mergers and acquisitions have continued among Turkish retailers. For example, Migros acquired Tansas in 2005. Thus, Migros became the biggest food retailer with 721 stores in Turkey. Ozcan (2007) analysed Migros activities and according to Ozcan, Migros made a strategic decision to expand in Russia and central Asia since it was nearly impossible to enter the European market for an emerging Turkish retailer while European competitors such as Tesco focused on the Eastern European market. Migros have become a symbol of modern retailing in Russia and central Asia. In 2006, Migros had three stores in Azerbaijan, ten shopping malls and forty-nine stores in Russia and two shopping malls and five stores in Kazakhstan; it also had stores in Bulgaria and one store and a hypermarket in Macedonia. Baku was selected as a first case of international expansion because of its cultural and physically closest to Turkey. It was followed by the investments in Russia, Kazakhstan, and, Balkans (Bulgaria and Macedonia) and these investments made Migros international retailer. Migros entered the Russian market during the economic crisis in 1998 as Ramstore. Ramstores were welcomed by Russian politicians and consumers at a time when Russia was not an attractive market for large Western retailers and there were still food shortages. Turkey Grocery Stores and Dealers Federation (2000) claimed that consumers preferred hypermarkets and supermarkets instead of grocery stores because of they offered low price. Kursunluoglu (2008) showed that consumers preferred hypermarkets and supermarkets instead of grocery stores thereby some reasons except price such as being a reliable retailer, having broad merchandise assortments, and having an impressive in-store atmosphere. The law drafts about protecting the competition in retail industry have been prepared for many years. The first law was prepared in 1973 as it was mentioned below, and the second one was prepared in 2008 to protect small sized retailers. According to the law draft, supermarkets and hypermarkets over than 400 m² should establish out of town, have free car park and limited working hours. There are many laws in other countries such as Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, Robinson–Patman Act of 1936 in America, Sapin Law in 1993 in France, PPG6 in 1988 in England (Lebhar, 2012; Courser, 2005; OECD, 1998; Tek, 2008; Wood et al., 2006). The urban population is higher in Turkey than other European countries. It has been creating the potential use of both shopping centres and traditional retailers. Yet small-scale retailing has been struggling to compete with organized, large scale retailers and shopping centres, it seems that the competition has continued to favour the latter (Erkip et al., 2013). Characteristics of Turkish Retailing Ozcan (1997) showed the five main elements that influence and form the Turkish retailing sector. The first element was the evolution of specialization in Turkish retailing. Within this evolution, store concept and its product line have changed from the stores that sell everything to the stores that specialize on specific product line. The second element was the opening domestic market to the foreign countries thanks to economic growth and liberal politics. It has increased the capacity of foreign investments in retail sector. New European Scientific Journal February 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 118 technologies and technics were the third element that affect retail sector in a positive way, thus retail sector has begun to be more organized and modern retailing has developed. The fourth element was that multinational European retailers’ interests on Southern European markets have influenced Turkish retail sector. Mergers and acquisitions have provided to enter the advanced methods into the retail industry. The fifth element was the increasing in disposable income and formation of new consumption models. For example, consumer behaviours have changed and consumers have begun to develop different shopping styles such as buying from shopping centres since shopping centres contain every need in specialized stores under one roof. Retailing sector has been developing for two decades in Turkey. Especially after the year 2000, the industry became the pioneer sector of the economy since its increasing attraction. The attraction of retail sector have been affected by some factors (Cengiz and Ozden, 2002; Tahiroglu, 1999) such as increasing in consumption, increasing the numbers of large sized retailers’ stores, attracting investments through deferred payment and cash selling, being profitable investments in the long term for the investors since finding the appropriate location for stores were limited and expensive, increasing the encouragements of foreign investors by domestic investors about entry strategies like mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures. There were two main factors that European retail chains entered Turkish market. The first one was that per capita consumption rates had reached a stable structure in Western Europe. The second reason was about the restriction of hypermarkets’ activities for conserving the competition in the industry. The most important countries in trans-boundary retailing were England, France, and Germany (Erdogan, 2003). Turkish retailing shares many of the characteristics of other Southern European economies such as the presence of a large number of small and individually operated companies, a modest rate of capital accumulation, and traditional food production and distribution systems which are also typical in Greece, Portugal, and Spain (Ozcan, 2000; Bennison, 1995; Salgueiro, 1995) and also Eastern European countries such as Hungary and Poland where the transformation of retailing has also been recognized as incipient in 1990s (Tokatli and Boyaci, 1998). Table 1: The most common retail formats in Europe Channel 1 Channel 2 Channel 3 France Hypermarket Supermarket Specialty Stores England Superstore Supermarket Convenience Stores Germany Discount Stores Hypermarket Specialty Stores Italy Supermarket Hypermarket Specialty Stores Spain Hypermarket Supermarket Specialty Stores Source: Myers, 2003, Orel, 2010. Myers (2003) showed the most common retail formats in Europe and they were generally food retailers as it can be seen in Table 1. UK food retailers have not been as ambitious as their counterparts in the non-food retail sector; they have been more concerned with the development of the superstore format in the domestic market (Myers and Alexander, 1996). Turkish retailing also has focused on the food retailing in these years. Torlak et al. (2005) shows that the customers of supermarkets and discount stores have different behaviours; for example the supermarket customers perceive physical aspects and store policy dimensions at a higher level whereas the discount store customers give more priority to the interaction with personnel dimension. Table 2 below shows the top ten retailers worldwide in 2011. Wal-Mart was number one in annual revenue with $ 446,950 million and its growth share was just 6 % whereas Costco’s revenue growth was the highest with 14.1 %. European Scientific Journal February 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 119 Table 2: Top 10 Retailers Worldwide, 2011 Rank Name Country of origin Retail revenue (US$mil) Retail revenue growth Numbers of countries in operation % revenue from foreign operations 1 Wal-Mart U.S. 446,950 6.0 % 28 28.4 % 2 Carrefour France 113,197 - 9.8 % 33 56.7 % 3 Tesco U.K. 101,574 5.8 % 13 34.5 % 4 Metro Germany 92,905 - 0.8 % 33 61.1 % 5 Kroger U.S. 90,374 10.0 % 1 0.0 % 6 Costco U.S. 88,915 14.1 % 9 27.0 % 7 Schwarz Germany 87,841 5.8 % 26 55.8 % 8 Aldi Germany 73,375 3.7 % 17 57.1 % 9 Walgreen U.S. 72,184 7.1 % 2 1.5 % 10 The Home Depot U.S. 70,395 3.5 % 5 11.4 % Source: Deloitte, 2013 Carrefour and Metro had the biggest share in the numbers of countries served and they took more than half of their revenues through foreign operations. Also German retailers Aldi and Schwarz took the biggest part of their revenues through their foreign operations however their foreign operations were less than Carrefour and Metro. According to Deliotte (2013); fast moving consumer good (FMCG) sector was the leading sector in 2011. The share of retail companies by sector: 54 % FMCG (135 companies of 250), 22 % hardlines and leisure (55 companies of 250), 15.6 % fashion (39 companies of 250), 8.4 % diversified (21 companies of 250). The retail market for FMCG consists of various retail channels. The International Standard Industry Classification (ISIC, Revision 3) classifies retail channels into seven categories at the 4-digit level: ISIC 5211 retail sale in non-specialized stores, ISIC 5219 other retail sale in non-specialized stores (department stores, etc), ISIC 5220 retail sale of food, beverages and tobacco in specialized stores, ISIC 5231 retail sale of pharmaceutical and medical goods, cosmetic and toilet articles, ISIC 5251 retail sale via mail order houses, ISIC 5252 retail sale via stalls and markets, and ISIC 5259 other non-store retail sale. There is no firm in categories ISIC 5251 and 5252 in Turkey (Celen et al., 2005). Within the effects of globalization, Turkish retailing concentrate on FMCG sector with its numerous retailers. The growth rate of FMCG in Turkey was 0.8 % in November 2011 whereas it increased to 4.8 % in September 2013 (Retail Turkiye, 2013). Relations with Albania The Turkish retail industry has been developing since 1980s. It has too many foreign operations and Turkish retailers have begun to enter foreign countries for a long time. Turkish foreign operations in Albania were analysed since retailing sector in Albania takes too much investments nowadays and one of the strongest investors in Albanian retail industry is Turkey. Albania was classified as low-medium country in terms of degree of privatization and development of retail sector according to the information about foreign direct investment, governmental efforts, retail sales level, number and type of retailers. Albania seemed to have limited development in the retailing sector, and thus was rated as a low-medium country. In the result of cluster analysis, it was classified as Low to Low–Medium (LLM) developed country (Manrai et al, 2001). Bitzenis and Nito (2005) analyzed the obstacles and problems encountered when doing business in Albania and showed that the most important obstacles were unfair competition, changes in taxation procedures, lack of financial resources, and problems related to public order. In recent years the transitioning economy, the new class of consumers, and the change in the food retail sector have changed consumer behaviour and consumption preferences in Albania (Chan-Halbrendt et al., 2010). Albanian consumer behaviours and life styles have European Scientific Journal February 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 120 changed because of the economic growth, improvement in the standard of living, fast urbanization, and trade liberalization in the country. The transition from a centrally planned socialist economy to a market oriented economy has also given rise to a larger urban middleincome class of consumers. The food demand from the emerging urban middle-income consumers, combined with the gradual consolidation of the retail sector and the recent establishment of the first supermarket chains, has strong implications for the agrifood industry, which in the past has been almost exclusively based on price (Leonetti et al. 2009). Increase in urban middle income consumers along with consolidation of the retail sector has created changes in consumption preferences in Albania. The GRDI ranks the top 30 developing countries on a 0-to-100-point scale for retail investment based on several macroeconomic and retail-specific variables such as market attractiveness (25%), country risk (25%), market saturation (25%), and time pressure (25%). The countries were classified as “on the radar”-first ten countries, “to consider”- countries in the rank 11-20, and “lower priority”- countries in the rank 21-30. Some countries from the 2013 GRDI were shown in Table 3. Table 3: 2013 Global Retail Development Index™ Rank 2013 Country MA* CR* MS* TP* GRDI Rank 2012 1 Brazil 100 86.2 43.3 48.3 69.5 - 2 Chile 95.6 100 18.7 54.3 67.1 - 3 Uruguay 92 73.9 63.5 36.5 66.5 +1 4 China 62.1 67.9 34.3 100 66.1 -1 5 United Arab Emirates 95.8 94.6 3 60.8 63.5 +2 6 Turkey 86.8 83.7 28.9 50.9 62.6 +7 7 Mongolia 17.7 37 99 96.5 62.5 +2 8 Georgia 36.6 63.8 83.4 61.9 61.4 -2 9 Kuwait 87.8 87.1 36.4 22.2 58.4 +3 10 Armenia 32.3 63.6 93.5 43.6 58.2 N/A 15 Sri Lanka 16.6 60.5 81.8 58.6 54.4 - 20 Jordan 53.1 65 65.9 19.6 50.9 -2 25 Botswana 38.7 82 31.8 38.5 47.8 -5 30 Albania 30.6 35 73.6 40.9 45.1 -5 * MA = Market attractiveness. 0 = low attractiveness, 100 = high attractiveness; CR = Country risk. 0 = high risk, 100 = low risk; MS = Market saturation. 0 = saturated, 100 = not saturated; TP = Time pressure. 0 = no time pressure, 100 = urgency to enter Source: A.T. Kearney, 2013 Turkey continues to grow up and it moves seven spots in the GRDI to take 6th place. In Turkey, retail expansion is fuelled by strong consumer demand and high levels of disposable income. The modern retail environment is becoming more diverse in this market, with sectors such as luxury, apparel, and consumer electronics booming and quickly expanding outside of major cities. Albania at 30th rank remains attractive to some international retailers, particularly from neighbouring markets, yet their potential has fallen compared to other developing markets in the GRDI because of their small size and low levels of consumer wealth. Although the economic situation in Greece and Italy has affected consumer spending in Albania, government moves to liberalize the economic framework. Belgian food retailer Delhaize has emerged as a leader in the market after its 2011 acquisition of Delta M Group, with 19 outlets in the country. Carrefour's Marinopoulos franchise acquired the Euromax supermarket chain to strengthen its position in Albania. The market has plenty of room for growth. With small, independent stores dominating the landscape, the top five grocery players represent only 2 percent of the market (A.T. Kearney, 2013). Kaleshi and Solanki (2010) showed that the EU countries made 77% of all companies operating in Albania, with a total number of 1,000 foreign companies. Italy and Greece are the main investors due to the fact that these countries are bordering Albania. Moreover, these European Scientific Journal February 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 121 two countries are the main export countries of Albanian products. When taking into consideration the numbers of foreign companies operating in Albania, 40% of foreign companies were Italian, while 26% of them are Greek. During the years 1998-2007, Albanian Government has signed mainly trade agreements with some countries to stimulate FDI inflows, and one of them was Turkey. The Balkan countries made 13% of the total number of the investing companies, and they were dominated by Turkey, which made 8% of the total number of foreign companies operating in Albania. Free Trade Agreement between Turkey and Albania was signed in 2006. With this agreement, tariff and non-tariff barriers were eliminated and numerous subjects such as sanitary and phytosanitary measures, technical barriers to trade, intellectual property, rules of origin, internal taxation, anti-dumping and countervailing measures, safeguards, and balance of payments measures were regulated. Trade volume between Turkey and Albania was estimated as 354 million US$ in 2012 with a contraction of 10 % compared to 2011. In 2012, imports from Albania were 99 million US$, whereas exports to Albania were 256 million US$ (Ministry of Economy, 2012). According to the foreign capital stock of Albania (Kaleshi and Solanki, 2010); the main investor was Greece with 54 % of the total investments. The Greek investments in Albania were spread up in the following sectors: 62 % in the telecommunication, transportation and depot sector; 18 % in the banking sector; 7 % in the industry sector. Turkey was the second investors 12 % of the investments. There has been a privatization of important sectors in the Albanian economy, including land lines of telecommunication through the company ALB Telekom, and this has made Turkey the second country. Italian companies were the third with 11 % of the capital inflows in Albania. Two main sectors were banking and industry sector. The fourth country was Austria with 10 % of the investment in two main sectors as banking and insurance. Germany (3 %), USA (2%) were the other investor countries. According to Kaleshi and Solanki (2010), foreign enterprises have operated in different sectors in Albania. The first sector was trade/retail shops and trade arbitrage, the second sector was industry, mainly textiles and clothing by Italian companies, and the third was banking sector. On the other hand, the main sector of investment is the transportation, storage, and communication sector. This sector represents 40.5 % of the capital. The second sector was monetary and financial intermediaries with 33 % of total capital, the third sector was processing industry with 11 % of capital and the fourth sector was wholesale and retail trade, automobiles, motorcycles, personal belongings and appliances with 5.9 % of total capital. The biggest Turkish investor in Albania is Calik Holding. It was one of the main players of the communication sector of Albania by acquiring the largest fixed line and internet provider (Albtelecom) and its GSM license (Eagle Mobile) in 2007. Eagle Mobile was the first operator that offers edge and mobile TV. Mukli et al. (2012) analysed the FDI and entry strategies of foreign mobile operators to Albania market. In this context, Vodafone Albania and Eagle Mobile have been analysed as the biggest operators in Albania. Albtelecom has increased its market efficiency by offering high service quality, powerful technical infrastructure, and special campaigns. Calik Holding acquired 60 percent shares of Banka Kombetare Tregtare (BKT), the second biggest bank of Albania. BKT which was selected the best bank of Albania twice aimed to develop its position in Albanian economy (Calik, 2009). Mucaj (2013) claimed that Albania is a tax heaven and there is no custom duty for all capital investment from investment companies. In the last 20 years, Turkey has invested approximately US$1 billion in Albania. Turkey and Albania have over 160 bilateral agreements in almost every area of cooperation. More than Turkey's 50 largest companies European Scientific Journal February 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 122 operate currently in the Albania. Total trade volume between two countries reached 43.840 million leke in 2012. Albania import textile products from Turkey (KobiEfor, 2013). There are lots of Turkish brands such as Koton, Lc Waikiki, Little Big, and Collezione in Albanian shopping centres such as QTU and City Park. Pegasus Airlines has continued its investments in Albania as a service retailer. Conclusion In a conclusion, there has been lots of trade capacity between two countries especially in retail industry. Two countries have lots of common share in economic perspective. Small and medium sized enterprises have significant role in both economies (Keskin and Senturk, 2010). The investments in retail industry should be developed by the governments’ incentives. The future research may focus on analysing the incentives and barriers of Turkish investments in Albania with the technics of survey. References: A.T. Kearney, (2013), The 2013 Global Retail Development Index™, https://www.atkearney.com/consumer-products-retail/global-retail-development-index/fullreport/-/asset_publisher/oPFrGkbIkz0Q/content/2013-global-retail-development-index/10192 Bennison, D. (1995), Retail planning policy in Greece, in R. Davies (ed.), Retailing Planning Policies in Western Europe, Routledge: London. Bitzenis, A., and Nito, E. (2005), Obstacles to entrepreneurship in a transition business environment: the case of Albania, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(4), 564-578. Bocutoglu, E. and Atasoy, Y. (2001), Yükselen süpermarket olgusu karşısında bakkaliye sektörünün yeri ve Trabzon örneği, Trabzon Esnaf ve Sanatkarlar Odaları Birliği Yayınları: Trabzon, Turkey. Calik (2009), Calik Holding grows in Europe with investments in Albania, http://www.calik.com/en/PressReleases2009/2010/10/25/calik_holding_grows_in_europe_wi th_investments_in_albania?id=7c9b25b2-c486-496c-993e-6404d4a9ef23, Access: October 2013. Celen, A., Erdogan, T, Taymaz, E. (2005), Fast Moving Consumer Goods: Competitive Conditions and Policies, ERC Working Papers in Economics, 05/03. Cengiz, E., and Ozden, B. (2002), Perakendecilikte buyuk alısveris merkezleri ve tüketicilerin büyük alısveris merkezleri ile ilgili tutumlarını tespit etmeye yönelik bir araştırma, Ege Academic Review, 2(1), 64-77. Chan-Halbrendt, C., Zhllimab, E., Sisiorc, G., Imamid, D., and Leonettie, L. (2010), Consumer preferences for olive oil in Tirana, Albania, International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 13(3). Coskun, R. (2001), Determinants of direct foreign investment in Turkey, European Business Review, 13(4), 221-226. Courser, Z. (2005), Wal-Mart and the politics of American retail, Competitive Enterprise Institute Publication, 10. Deloitte (2013), Global Powers of Retailing 2013, http://www.deloitte.com/assets/DcomAustralia/Local%20Assets/Documents/Industries/Consumer%20business/Deloitte_Global_Po wers_of_Retail_2013.pdf, Access: October 2013. Erdogan, T. (2003), Rekabet hukuku açısından perakende sektöründe alım gücü, Rekabet Kurumu: Ankara, Turkey. Erkip, F., Kızılgün, O., Mugan, G. (2013), The role of retailing in urban sustainability: the Turkish case, European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(3), 329-342. European Scientific Journal February 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 123 Kaleshi, E. and Solanki, M.K.S. (2010), A Mechanistic Framework for Foreign Direct Investment in the case of Albania, Master Thesis Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden. Kaynak, E. (1982), Marketing in the Third World, Praeger: New York. Kaynak, E. (1986), Marketing and Economic Development, Praeger: New York. Keskin, H., and Senturk, C. (2010), The importance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in economies: swot analyses of the SME sector in Turkey and Albania, Nigde Universitesi İİBF Dergisi, 3(1), 116-132. KobiEfor (2013), Türk yatırımcılarını baş tacı eden ülke: Arnavutluk, http://www.kobiefor.com.tr/ulke/pazarulke/turk-yatirimcilarini-bas-taci-eden-ulke-arnavutluk-h1550.html, Access: October 2013. Kose, A.H. and Oncu, A. (2000,) İşgücü piyasaları ve uluslararası isbolumunde uzmanlasmanın mekansal boyutları: 1980 sonrası dönemde Turkiye imalat sanayii, Toplum ve Bilim, 86, 72-90. Kumcu, E. and Kumcu, M.E. (1987), Determinants of food retailing in developing economies: the case of Turkey, Journal of Macromarketing, 26-40. Kursunluoglu, E. (2006), Tüketicilerin süpermarket seçme tercihlerini etkileyen kriterlerin belirlenmesine yönelik İzmir ilinde bir araştırma, Master Thesis Dokuz Eylul University, Turkey. Kursunluoglu, E. (2008), The criteria that influence consumers’ supermarket choices, IV. International Conference on Business, Management and Economics, 2, 33-41. Kursunluoglu, E. (2009), Mağazalı perakendeciler ve musteri servisleri, Journal of Yasar University, 4(14), 2173-2184. Lebhar, G.M. (2012), Chain Stores in America, 1859-1950, Hardpress Publishing: US. Leonetti L, Viaggi, D., and Imami, D. (2009), Analysis of the dynamics of the wine market in Albania, Newmedit. Manrai, L. A., Manrai, A. K., and Lascu, D. N. (2001), A country-cluster analysis of the distribution and promotion infrastructure in Central and Eastern Europe, International Business Review, 10(5), 517-549. Ministry of Economy (2012), Turkey-Albania Free Trade Agreement, http://www.economy.gov.tr/index.cfm?sayfa=tradeagreements&bolum=fta&country=AL&re gion=0, Access: October 2013. Mucaj, G. (2013), Turkey is Albania’s strategic partner in Balkans - interviewed by Peter M. Tase, http://www.eurasiareview.com/27042013-turkey-is-albanias-strategic-partner-inbalkans-interview-ambassador-mucaj/, Access: October 2013. Mukli, L., Cota, A., Mersini, R. (2012), Foreign direct investment and entry modes of mobile telecommunication companies in Albania, European Scientific Journal, 8(7). Myers, H. and Alexander, N. (1996), European food retailers’ evaluation of global markets, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 24(6), 34-43. Myers, H. (2003), European food retailers: paths for growth, European Retail Digest, 38. OECD (1998), Competition law and policy in France, http://www.oecd.org/france/34825657.pdf, Access: October 2013. Orel, F.D. (2010), Uluslararası perakendecilik, Detay Yayıncılık: Ankara, Turkey. Ozbilgic, Z. (2012), Foreign direct investment (FDI), Republic of Turkey Ministry of Economy,http://www.ekonomi.gov.tr/upload/1F5D92A4-0380-4636- 2383FCAB5B8E39E5/zergul_ozbilgic.pdf, Access: November 2013. Ozcan, G.B. (1997), Perakendecilikte evrenselleşme, Görüş (TUSIAD), 64. Ozcan, G.B. (2000), The transformation of Turkish retailing: survival strategies of small and medium-sized retailers, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 2(1). Ozcan, G.B. (2001), Patterns of vertical and horizontal integration in Turkish retailing, European Retail Digest, 32, 35-41. European Scientific Journal February 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 124 Ozcan, G.B. (2007), Surviving through transplantation and cloning: the Swiss Migros hybrid, Migros-Turk, Remaking Management ed. by Smith, C., McSweeney, B., and Fitzgerald, R., 181-206. Ozkan, B. and Akpinar, G. (2003), Gıda perakendeciliginde yeni bir acılım: market markali gida urunleri, Pazarlama Dünyası, 17(1), 22. Retail Turkiye (2013), Türkiye Toplam FMCG Ciro Trendi ve Büyüme Oranları (Kasım 2011 - Eylül 2013), http://www.retailturkiye.com/fmcg-ve-retail-pazari/turkiye-toplam-fmcgciro-trendi-ve-buyume-oranlari-kasim-2011-eylul-2013, Access: November 2013. Salgueiro, T.B. (1995), Retail planning policy in Portugal, in R. Davies (ed.), Retailing Planning Policies in Western Europe, Routledge: London. Samli, C. (1964), Wholesaling in an economy of scarcity: Turkey, Journal of Marketing, 28, 55-58. Samli, C. (1970), Comparative analysis of marketing in Romania and Yugoslavia, Southern Journal of Business, 5(2). Savasci, İ. (2002), Tüketicinin perakendeci marka tercihleri: Izmir hipermarketleri kapsamında bir arastırma, Master Thesis Ege University, Turkey. Tahiroglu, F. (1999), Musteri odaklı kaliteli servis ekipleri, Human Resources, 8. Tek, O.B. and Ozgul, E. (2005), Modern pazarlama ilkeleri, Birleşik Matbaacılık: İzmir, Turkey. Tek, O.B. (2008), Turkiye’de perakendecilik cagı ve buyuk olcekli perakendeci magazalarıngelişimi,http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2FDocuments%2FPer%2 5c5%259fembe%2BKonferans%25c4%25b1%2BYay%25c4%25b1n%2Fperskonfyyn24.pdf, Access: November 2013. Tokatli, N. and Boyaci, Y. (1998), The changing retail industry and retail landscapes: the case of post-1980 Turkey, Cities, 15(5), 345-359. Torlak, O., Uzkurt, C., and Ozmen, M. (2010), Dimensions of service quality in grocery retailing: a case from Turkey, Management Research Review, 33(5), 413-422. Turkey Grocery Stores and Dealers Federation (2000), Hiper-grosmarketler karşısında bakkal ve market esnafının durumu, http://www.tbbf.org.tr/tr/guncel/rapor.html, September 2013. Varinli, I. and Oyman, M. (2013), Perakendecilige giris, ed. by Ozturk, S.A., Anadolu Universitesi Yayınları: Eskisehir, Turkey. Wood, S., Lowe, M., Wrigley, N. (2006), Life after PPG6—recent UK food retailer responses to planning regulation tightening, International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 16(1), 23-41. Yeldan, A. E. (2001), On the Imf-directed disinflation program in Turkey: a program for stabilization and usterity or a recipe for impoverishment and financial chaos?. Available at SSRN 290539. Yilmaz, M. and Altunisik, R. (2003), Perakende sektorunde kurulus yeri seciminde cografi bilgi sisteminin kullanılması, 8. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi, Erciyes Universitesi. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission